Skip to content
Loading map…

Leading Edge Physiotherapy St. Albert - Pool

103 - 145 Carleton Drive St. Albert AB T8N 3S6 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Leading Edge Physiotherapy St. Albert - Pool has been inspected 26 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since November 30, 2023. The most recent inspection, on April 9, 2026, recorded 1 infraction.

11 of 26 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 5 inspections with 3 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 18 times across 14 separate inspections, most recently on April 9, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on July 22, 2024. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, water-test logs, posted bather rules and emergency procedures. Daily test logs are how operators show the water was checked and treated between inspections.

    Recorded once on July 22, 2024. For example: Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

26 inspections

  1. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC count from April 7, 2027 water sample had a count of 830 CFU/mL.
  2. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  3. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Sample collected Dec 9, 2025 showed a high HPC (540 CFU).
  4. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Sample collected November 12, 2025, showed a presence of total coliforms.
  6. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC was 130 cfu.
  9. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample was present for total coliforms.
  11. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample was present for total coliforms.
  12. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  13. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC count was noted to be at 120 CFU/mL. The operator was advised to increase the free chlorine levels.
  14. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliforms were present in the water sample. The operator was advised to increase the free chlorine levels of the pool.
  15. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  16. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliforms were present in the sample taken November 26 2024.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC count was noted to be at 2150 CFU/mL.
  17. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliforms were present in the sample taken November 26 2024.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC count was noted to be at 80 CFU/mL. The operator was advised to monitoring the free chlorine levels.
  18. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC count was noted to be at 80 CFU/mL. The operator was advised to monitoring the free chlorine levels.
  19. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  20. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC is present per 100 mL.
  21. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  22. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliforms are present.
  23. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  24. Risk Management Inspection

    5 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The total alkalinity was noted to be out of range. Please ensure to maintain total alkalinity between 60-180 ppm.
    • 06. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Critical)?
      • 1. The operator indicated that the chlorine injection was not in operational state this morning and they shock chlorinated the pool. Please ensure that the auto controller system must remain in operational state at all times. Please do not add chemicals manually.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. The operator was unable to provide information on cartridge filter replacement/cleaning. Please provide this information.2. PHI was unable to confirm whether the automated system is in operational state or not. Please ensure that the automated system is in operational state.
    • 10. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this pool (Non-Critical)?
      • It was noted that the color Q test kit needs calibration. Please calibrate or acquire a new pool test kit.
    • 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
      • It was noted that the facility was not conducting water testing over the weekends. Please ensure to conduct chemical tests and maintain records on daily basis.
  25. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. The free chlorine and total chlorine were noted to be out of range. Please re-mediate this concern.2. The total alkalinity was noted to be at 188 ppm. Please ensure to maintain total alkalinity between 60 -180 ppm.
  26. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website