Skip to content
Loading map…

Post Hotel - Swimming Pool

200 Pipestone Road Lake Louise AB T0L 1E0 · Aquatic Facility

10 inspections

  1. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • June 30/26; Sample not tested (stat holiday).
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • Suction outlet covers are due for replacement along with updated anti-entrapment plan. Plan to correct any anti-entrapment deficiencies during shutdown in October - good.
    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • A few small tiles popping off surface of the basin. Repair tiles as needed.
  2. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Aug 5/25; HPC is 610cfu/ml. Treat and resample.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • Suction outlet covers are due for replacement along with updated anti-entrapment plan. Plan to correct any anti-entrapment deficiencies during shutdown in October - good.
    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • A few small tiles popping off surface of the basin. Repair tiles as needed.
  3. Demand Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample from October 8th, 2024, had an HPC of 110 FCU/ml. - Operators were informed to treat and re-sample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Dec.3/24 Sample had elevated HPC Of 220cfu/ml. Treat and resample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Jan.21/25; Sample had elevated HPC of 1180cfu/ml. Shock chlorinate (treat) and resample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Aug 5/25; HPC is 610cfu/ml. Treat and resample.
  4. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample from October 8th, 2024, had an HPC of 110 FCU/ml. - Operators were informed to treat and re-sample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Dec.3/24 Sample had elevated HPC Of 220cfu/ml. Treat and resample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Jan.21/25; Sample had elevated HPC of 1180cfu/ml. Shock chlorinate (treat) and resample.
  5. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample from October 8th, 2024, had an HPC of 110 FCU/ml. - Operators were informed to treat and re-sample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Dec.3/24 Sample had elevated HPC Of 220cfu/ml. Treat and resample.
  6. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample from October 8th, 2024, had an HPC of 110 FCU/ml. - Operators were informed to treat and re-sample.
  7. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Aug 27/24 sample not tested (no id label). Resample.
    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • pH was too low (6.6). From records, it looks like pH has been fluctuating (6.8 noted, but also 7.5). Re-calibrate automated controller to ensure pH levels on manual tests match controller levels and are within acceptable range.
  9. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • pH was too low (6.6). From records, it looks like pH has been fluctuating (6.8 noted, but also 7.5). Re-calibrate automated controller to ensure pH levels on manual tests match controller levels and are within acceptable range.
  10. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • June 5/23; Sample not processed 24 hrs +
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Dec.27/23; Sample not processed; 24hrs +