Skip to content
Loading map…

Rain Salon & Spa

1688 - 8882 170 Street NW Edmonton AB T5T 4M2 · Personal Services

Inspection summary

Rain Salon & Spa has been inspected 2 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since January 28, 2025. The most recent inspection, on October 30, 2025, recorded 1 infraction.

None of the 2 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there was 1 inspection with 1 infraction recorded. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on October 30, 2025. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 2 times on January 28, 2025. For example: Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on January 28, 2025. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

2 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • Written procedures were not available for skin cleansing or accidental injuries. Please fill out page 2 of the AHS written templates for manicure, pedicure and waxing services separately and review/sign page 5. See link below:https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/wf/eph/wf-eph-written-procedure-templates-personal-services.pdf
  2. Monitoring Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • Written procedures were not available for skin cleansing or accidental injuries. Please fill out page 2 of the AHS written templates for manicure, pedicure and waxing services separately and review/sign page 5. See link below:https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/wf/eph/wf-eph-written-procedure-templates-personal-services.pdf
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Preempt CS20 high level disinfectant was being used to disinfect semi-critical esthetic tools. The corresponding AHP7 test strips were not available. The high-level disinfectant solution must be tested daily and results logged. See AHS high level disinfectant log sheet at the link below:
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Hair tools were not being fully emersed in the containers of Barbicide. Fill the containers to the top or high enough that the tools are fully emersed for adequate disinfection
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • An open tube of Augenblick hair dye was onsite and had been used for brow/lash tints. Label indicates it is not for use not brows or lashes. Staff indicated they usually use refectocil only. Discarded onsite.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website