Skip to content
Loading map…

Skintrient Facial Care

6075 King Landing SW Edmonton AB T6W 3Z7 · Personal Services

Inspection summary

Skintrient Facial Care has been inspected once by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), on March 5, 2025. The most recent inspection, on March 5, 2025, recorded 4 infractions.

No inspections are on record from the past 12 months. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 2 times on March 5, 2025. For example: Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded once on March 5, 2025. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on March 5, 2025. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

1 inspection

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • There is no written procedure for application of an aniseptic product prior to extraction procedure.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • * Semi-crtical tools (tweezers and scissors for eyebrows trimming) were not disinfected with a high-level disinfectant. Ensure that tools are disinfected with a high-level disinfectant, which is tested daily, and the records of testing are maintained.* Alcohol used for disinfection of machines attachment tools did not have a DIN.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • There were no manufacturer's instructions available for V Max machine.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Some cosmetic products did not have adequate labelling.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website