Skip to content
Loading map…

Subway Restaurants

2965 Immel St, Abbotsford · Restaurant

Official record from Fraser Health →

Inspection summary

Subway Restaurants has been inspected 18 times by Fraser Health Authority since June 28, 2017. The most recent inspection, on October 6, 2026, found no infractions.

11 of 18 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 0 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Food temperature control.

The last 6 inspections in a row found no infractions. The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded once on February 3, 2022. For example: 205 - Cold potentially hazardous food stored/displayed above 4 °C. [s. 14(2)]

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Equipment has to be built from cleanable materials, kept in good repair and stored properly. These findings are mostly about upkeep, like a cracked shelf, a worn gasket or utensils stored the wrong way. They are generally lower risk but show how well the kitchen is maintained.

    Recorded once on May 3, 2024. For example: 303 - Equipment/facilities/hot & cold water for sanitary maintenance not adequate [s. 17(3); s. 4(1)(f)]

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, required signage, written procedures and logs. These findings are administrative: the documentation was missing or out of date at the time of inspection.

    Recorded once on June 28, 2017. For example: 103 - Failure to hold a valid permit while operating a food service establishment [s. 8(1)]

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on May 3, 2019. For example: 502 - In operator’s absence, no staff on duty has FOODSAFE Level 1 or equivalent [s. 10(2)]

About this data

These results come from Fraser Health Authority, which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

18 inspections

  1. Routine Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Routine Inspection

    0 infractions

  3. Routine Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Routine Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Routine Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Follow-Up Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Routine Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 303 - Equipment/facilities/hot & cold water for sanitary maintenance not adequate [s. 17(3); s. 4(1)(f)]
      • Observation: No hot water in premise
      • Corrective Action(s): Closure order issued. Contact once repaired.
      • Violation Score: 25
  8. Routine Inspection

    0 infractions

  9. Routine Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Routine Inspection

    0 infractions

  11. Follow-Up Inspection

    0 infractions

  12. Routine Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 205 - Cold potentially hazardous food stored/displayed above 4 °C. [s. 14(2)]
      • Observation: Deli meat line cooler at slightly above 4C - Tuna salad at 7.4C.
      • Corrective Action(s): Ensure that coolers are able to maintain a temperature of 4C or below. Keep unit closed when not busy to assist with maintaining temperature. Fresh ice placed under line cooler items during inspection and items to be filled halfway in containers.
      • Correct by: Feb 7, 2022
      • Violation Score: 5
  13. Routine Inspection

    0 infractions

  14. Routine Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 502 - In operator’s absence, no staff on duty has FOODSAFE Level 1 or equivalent [s. 10(2)]
      • Observation: in operators abence stafff not food safe trained
      • Corrective Action(s): at least one staff member to be food safe trained in operators absence
      • Violation Score: 1
  15. Routine Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 502 - In operator’s absence, no staff on duty has FOODSAFE Level 1 or equivalent [s. 10(2)]
      • Observation: staff not food safe trained
      • Corrective Action(s): at least staff member on shift requres food safe training in operators absence
      • Violation Score: 1
  16. Routine Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 502 - In operator’s absence, no staff on duty has FOODSAFE Level 1 or equivalent [s. 10(2)]
      • Observation: staff members do not have Foodsafe level 1 or equivalent
      • Corrective Action(s): at least one staff member is requred to be Foodsafe trained or equivalent.
      • Violation Score: 1
  17. Routine Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 502 - In operator’s absence, no staff on duty has FOODSAFE Level 1 or equivalent [s. 10(2)]
      • Observation: no staff with Food Safe training
      • Corrective Action(s): at least on staff or manager per shift requires Food Safe training
      • Violation Score: 1
  18. Routine Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 103 - Failure to hold a valid permit while operating a food service establishment [s. 8(1)]
      • Observation: PERMIT FEE NOT PAID
      • Corrective Action(s): pay pemit fee as per hand delivered letter
      • Violation Score: 1

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website