Skip to content
Loading map…

11020 53 Avenue NW - Swimming Pool

11020 53 Avenue NW Edmonton AB T6H 0S4 · Aquatic Facility

22 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The microbiological water sample 26EN-166E00095 submitted on June 15, 2026, was unsatisfactory: HPC over 57000. This is the second consecutive unsatisfactory result.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the microbiological water sample 26EN-160E00384 submitted on June 8, 2026, was unsatisfactory: HPC 310.
  3. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the microbiological water sample 26EN-160E00384 submitted on June 8, 2026, was unsatisfactory: HPC 310.
  4. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the microbiological water sample 26EN-005E00171 submitted on January 5, 2026, was unsatisfactory: HPC 120.
  6. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the microbiological water sample 25EN-308E00323 submitted on November 3, 2025, was unsatisfactory: HPC 160.
  8. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the microbiological water sample 25EN-308E00323 submitted on November 3, 2025, was unsatisfactory: HPC 160.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • The main drain outlet cover (Aquastar 32PD 101) expired on September 3, 2025. Replace the main drain outlet.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • An updated anti-entrapment compliance plan assessing the entrapment risks had not been developed and was not available for review. Develop a new anti-entrapment compliance plan reflecting the current equipment and submit the plan for review to Environmental Public Health.
  9. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 16.3 gpm/sq ft based on a filtration area of 4.9 sq ft and flow rate 80 gpm, which exceeds the maximum allowed flow rate of 15 gpm/ sq ft. To achieve proper rate of filtration, flow rate should be between 68 and 74 gpm. It was addressed during the inspection: flow rate was lowered to about 68 gpm, which resulted in rate of filtration 13.88 gpm/ sq ft, and turnover period 3.96 hours).
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • The main drain outlet cover (Aquastar 32PD 101) expired on September 3, 2025. Replace the main drain outlet.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • An updated anti-entrapment compliance plan assessing the entrapment risks had not been developed and was not available for review. Develop a new anti-entrapment compliance plan reflecting the current equipment and submit the plan for review to Environmental Public Health.
  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 16. Are proper testing, monitoring, and other records being properly maintained?
      • a. The pool operator is not available for testing and monitoring on Saturdays; however, the pool remains open to the public.b. A discrepancy was observed in the Free Available Chlorine (FAC) readings:-Free available chlorine (FAC) was measured at 5.7 ppm by EPH onsite while the pool operator's pool testing kit measured FAC at 1.88 ppm.-Please ensure this is addressed to verify the accuracy of the testing equipment.
  11. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between manual pH 7.6 and automated controller reading 7.37. Please address.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 16.3 gpm/sq ft based on a filtration area of 4.9 sq ft and flow rate 80 gpm, which exceeds the maximum allowed flow rate of 15 gpm/ sq ft. To achieve proper rate of filtration, flow rate should be between 68 and 74 gpm.
  12. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-344E00154 submitted on December 9, 2024, was unsatisfactory: HPC 540. The previous sample was satisfactory.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between manual pH 7.6 and automated controller reading 7.37. Please address.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 16.3 gpm/sq ft based on a filtration area of 4.9 sq ft and flow rate 80 gpm, which exceeds the maximum allowed flow rate of 15 gpm/ sq ft. To achieve proper rate of filtration, flow rate should be between 68 and 74 gpm.
  13. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-281E00175 submitted on October 7, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Total coliforms were present.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between manual pH 7.6 and automated controller reading 7.37. Please address.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 16.3 gpm/sq ft based on a filtration area of 4.9 sq ft and flow rate 80 gpm, which exceeds the maximum allowed flow rate of 15 gpm/ sq ft. To achieve proper rate of filtration, flow rate should be between 68 and 74 gpm.
  14. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between manual pH 7.6 and automated controller reading 7.37. Please address.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 16.3 gpm/sq ft based on a filtration area of 4.9 sq ft and flow rate 80 gpm, which exceeds the maximum allowed flow rate of 15 gpm/ sq ft. To achieve proper rate of filtration, flow rate should be between 68 and 74 gpm.
  15. Demand Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-205E00489 submitted on July 23, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Total coliforms present and HPC 240.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-205E00489 submitted on July 23, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Total coliforms present and HPC 240.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between manual pH 7.6 and automated controller reading 7.37. Please address.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 16.3 gpm/sq ft based on a filtration area of 4.9 sq ft and flow rate 80 gpm, which exceeds the maximum allowed flow rate of 15 gpm/ sq ft. To achieve proper rate of filtration, flow rate should be between 68 and 74 gpm.
  16. Monitoring Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample EN24-163E00420 submitted on June 11, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Total coliforms were present. The previously submitted sample 24EN-156E00554 (submitted on June 4, 2024) was satisfactory.
    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-177E00403 submitted on June 24, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Total coliform was present. Previous sample was satisfactory.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 16.3 gpm/sq ft based on a filtration area of 4.9 sq ft and flow rate 80 gpm, which exceeds the maximum allowed flow rate of 15 gpm/ sq ft. To achieve proper rate of filtration, flow rate should be between 68 and 74 gpm.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between manual pH 7.6 and automated controller reading 7.37. Please address.
  17. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-177E00403 submitted on June 24, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Total coliform was present. Previous sample was satisfactory.
    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample EN24-163E00420 submitted on June 11, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Total coliforms were present. The previously submitted sample 24EN-156E00554 (submitted on June 4, 2024) was satisfactory.
  18. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample EN24-163E00420 submitted on June 11, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Total coliforms were present. The previously submitted sample 24EN-156E00554 (submitted on June 4, 2024) was satisfactory.
  19. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample EN24-143E00901 submitted on May 22, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Total coliforms were present.
  20. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • the sample WE-24-0035353 submitted on April 15, 2024, was unsatisfactory: Total coliform present.
  21. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  22. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The microbiological water sample submitted on 2024-02-26 was unsatisfactory: Total Coliform present. Take all necessary action to ensure microbiologically safe water. Submit a new microbiological water sample at your earliest convenience once the water chemistry is balanced.