Skip to content
Loading map…

11235 31 Avenue NW - Swimming Pool

11235 31 Avenue NW Edmonton AB T6J 3V4 · Aquatic Facility

12 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 26EN-162E00578 submitted on June 11, 2026, was unsatisfactory: HPC 180.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The PH of the water was measured at 7.96, operator's measurement was at 8. Updated on April 22, 2026:* The pH was measured as 8.05, which is above the required range of 6.8 to 7.6. The same issue was observed during the previous inspection.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Automated chemical system was inconsistent with manual tests. Automated Controller- PH: 7.2, Manual reading PH: 7.96, Operator's PH reading: 8.0. Updated on April 22, 2026:* There was a discrepancy between the automated reading for pH 7.2 and the manual tested pH 8.05. Please address.
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The PH of the water was measured at 7.96, operator's measurement was at 8.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Automated chemical system was inconsistent with manual tests. Automated Controller- PH: 7.2, Manual reading PH: 7.96, Operator's PH reading: 8.0.
  6. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The PH of the water was measured at 7.96, operator's measurement was at 8.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Automated chemical system was inconsistent with manual tests. Automated Controller- PH: 7.2, Manual reading PH: 7.96, Operator's PH reading: 8.0.
  7. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between the automated reading for pH 7.3 and the manual tested pH 7.6 (7.57 when tested from the automated controller). Please address.
  9. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-193E00837 submitted on July 11, 2024, was unsatisfactory: HPC 310.
  11. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The pH was measured 7.68. It was adjusted to 7.46 during the inspection.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between the automated reading for pH 7.3 and the manual tested pH 7.68. It was addressed during the inspection.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Flow rate was 83 gpm, which resulted in the rate of filtration 16.9 gpm/ft2. Corrected during the inspection: flow rate was deceased to about 73 gpm, which resulted in the rate of filtration 14.9 gpm/ft2. Ensure that the flow rate is maintained around 73 gpm.
  12. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions