Skip to content
Loading map…

11235 31 Avenue NW - Swimming Pool

11235 31 Avenue NW Edmonton AB T6J 3V4 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

11235 31 Avenue NW - Swimming Pool has been inspected 11 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since November 29, 2023. The most recent inspection, on July 3, 2026, found no infractions.

4 of 11 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 5 inspections with 5 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 8 times across 7 separate inspections, most recently on June 15, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 4 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on April 22, 2026. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

11 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 26EN-162E00578 submitted on June 11, 2026, was unsatisfactory: HPC 180.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The PH of the water was measured at 7.96, operator's measurement was at 8. Updated on April 22, 2026:* The pH was measured as 8.05, which is above the required range of 6.8 to 7.6. The same issue was observed during the previous inspection.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Automated chemical system was inconsistent with manual tests. Automated Controller- PH: 7.2, Manual reading PH: 7.96, Operator's PH reading: 8.0. Updated on April 22, 2026:* There was a discrepancy between the automated reading for pH 7.2 and the manual tested pH 8.05. Please address.
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The PH of the water was measured at 7.96, operator's measurement was at 8.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Automated chemical system was inconsistent with manual tests. Automated Controller- PH: 7.2, Manual reading PH: 7.96, Operator's PH reading: 8.0.
  6. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The PH of the water was measured at 7.96, operator's measurement was at 8.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Automated chemical system was inconsistent with manual tests. Automated Controller- PH: 7.2, Manual reading PH: 7.96, Operator's PH reading: 8.0.
  7. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between the automated reading for pH 7.3 and the manual tested pH 7.6 (7.57 when tested from the automated controller). Please address.
  9. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • the sample 24EN-193E00837 submitted on July 11, 2024, was unsatisfactory: HPC 310.
  11. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The pH was measured 7.68. It was adjusted to 7.46 during the inspection.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between the automated reading for pH 7.3 and the manual tested pH 7.68. It was addressed during the inspection.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Flow rate was 83 gpm, which resulted in the rate of filtration 16.9 gpm/ft2. Corrected during the inspection: flow rate was deceased to about 73 gpm, which resulted in the rate of filtration 14.9 gpm/ft2. Ensure that the flow rate is maintained around 73 gpm.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website