Skip to content
Loading map…

Body Revival Spa & Salon

1909 105 Street NW Edmonton AB T6J 5V9 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Body Revival Spa & Salon has been inspected 3 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since April 6, 2026. The most recent inspection, on April 28, 2026, found no infractions.

1 of 3 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 12 infractions recorded. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 6 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on April 27, 2026. For example: Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 2 times on April 6, 2026. For example: Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Some jurisdictions require operators to complete infection-prevention training, or to hold specific qualifications for higher-risk services such as tattooing, piercing or electrolysis. These findings mean the training record was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean a client was put at risk.

    Recorded once on April 6, 2026. For example: Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    The premises needs a working hand sink, a separate sink for cleaning instruments where required, cleanable surfaces, and good lighting and ventilation. Upkeep problems are usually lower risk on their own, but they make thorough cleaning harder.

    Recorded once on April 6, 2026. For example: Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded 2 times on April 6, 2026. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

3 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • The machine Dermalasedid not have manufacturer's instructions. Reported: use IPL. Ensure that the manufacturer's instructions are available or discontinue use of the equipment.
  3. Demand Inspection

    11 infractions

    • 02. Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?
      • The owner of the personal service business did not submit a notification about changes in provided services to the Alberta Health Services. Submitted during the inspection.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • Antiseptic product was consistently used for skin preparation prior to microneedling services. Acceptable antiseptic product was available and will be used.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation for sterile equipment was not retained with the clients' records. Ensure that sterility assurance documentation for all critical equipment used during services is retained with clients' forms. Discussed.
    • 17. Is reusable equipment cleaned properly (Critical)?
      • Pedicure fans were not visibly clean. Ensure that the pedicure fans are opened, cleaned and disinfected after each client.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Test strips available could not be used to test the concentration of high-level disinfectant available onsite (wrong test strips). Obtain the appropriate strips.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No records of testing of high-level disinfectant were available.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • The machine Dermalasedid not have manufacturer's instructions. Reported: use IPL. Ensure that the manufacturer's instructions are available or discontinue use of the equipment.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Some cosmetic products did not have appropriate labels (no ingredients listed, ingredients listed in the language other than English/French, or no labels). Ensure that all cosmetic products have appropriate labels.
    • 27. Is the facility maintained in a visibly clean state and are environmental surfaces cleaned and disinfected properly?
      • High-touch surfaces, including room doors, cupboard doors and light switch covers were not visibly clean. Please ensure that all surfaces in the facility are maintained in a sanitary state.
    • 29. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?
      • Several ceiling tiles were water-damaged/stained in the reprocessing room. Please replace.
    • 33. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this personal services facility (Non-Critical)?
      • Preempt wipes did not have an expiry date. Please replace.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website