Skip to content
Loading map…

Comfort Inn & Suites - Swimming Pool

3111 26 Street NE Calgary AB T1Y 7E4 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Comfort Inn & Suites - Swimming Pool has been inspected 15 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since January 26, 2024. The most recent inspection, on September 11, 2026, recorded 3 infractions.

2 of 15 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 4 inspections with 6 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality, Food temperature control and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 14 times across 11 separate inspections, most recently on September 11, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Inspectors check that anything that has to be kept at a set temperature, such as chilled or hot food, or equipment like sterilizers, stays in its safe range and that accurate thermometers are on hand. With food, temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on September 11, 2026. For example: Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on January 9, 2025. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.

    Recorded 10 times across 10 separate inspections, most recently on September 11, 2026. For example: Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

15 inspections

  1. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Resample needed as identification number was not listed on sample bottle. No results provided.
    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • 1. Pool basin was observed to be chipped and there was staining surrounding the area close to the main drain covers. Damaged or rough pool surfaces can harbor dirt, and microorganisms, making effective cleaning and disinfection difficult. Surface deterioration may pose risk of cuts and abrasions to bathers.**Ensure the stained area is thoroughly cleaned and assess the extent of the basin damage. If necessary, repair and resurface the chipped section.2. Debris and paint chips were observed accumulating in the pool basin. Debris can affect water quality and sanitation, and may interfere with effective pool maintenance and cleaning.**Ensure the pool basin is maintained in a clean and sanitary condition.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • Anti-entrapment plans for the swimming pool not available at the time of inspection.**Please ensure pool anti-entrapment plan is properly assessed and available onsite.
  2. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • 1. Pool basin was observed to be chipped and there was staining surrounding the area close to the main drain covers. Damaged or rough pool surfaces can harbor dirt, and microorganisms, making effective cleaning and disinfection difficult. Surface deterioration may pose risk of cuts and abrasions to bathers.**Ensure the stained area is thoroughly cleaned and assess the extent of the basin damage. If necessary, repair and resurface the chipped section.2. Debris and paint chips were observed accumulating in the pool basin. Debris can affect water quality and sanitation, and may interfere with effective pool maintenance and cleaning.**Ensure the pool basin is maintained in a clean and sanitary condition.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • Anti-entrapment plans for the swimming pool not available at the time of inspection.**Please ensure pool anti-entrapment plan is properly assessed and available onsite.
  3. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample (26ES-093E00007) submitted on April 3, 2026, was not tested as it was received by the lab on a weekend/holiday.Please resample the swimming pool.
  4. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The water sample collected on August 4, 2025, was not tested because the sample was received more than 24 hours after collection.
  6. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Risk Management Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Pool pH was measured at 8.11 at the time of the inspection.-Please adjust and maintain pool pH between 6.8 and 7.6.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The automatic chemical feeding and monitoring system was not in good working condition, the pH alert light was on at the time of the inspection.-Please repair and ensure the pool's automatic chemical feeding and monitoring system is in good working condition.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan onsite was not properly assessed, the operational flow rate obtained from the flow meter at the time of the inspection (73 GPM) was higher than the maximum flow rate (50 GPM) posted on the anti-entrapment plan.-Please reassess the swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan and ensure all the entrapment risk are properly evaluated/assessed.Also, email the anti-entrapment plan and its supporting document (Including pool's schematic plumbing diagram, sump diagram and its pipes dimension, drain cover certificate of compliance, and pump specifications) to the district inspection after the reassessment.*Outstanding violation since January 2023.
  8. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Pool pH was measured at 7.93 at the time of the inspection.-Please adjust and maintain pool pH between 6.8 and 7.6.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The automatic chemical feeding and monitoring system was not in good working condition and its reading was not consistent with manual reading. The pH alert light was on at the time of the inspection.-Please repair and ensure the pool's automatic chemical feeding and monitoring system is in good working condition.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan onsite was not properly assessed, the operational flow rate obtained from the flow meter at the time of the inspection (73 GPM) was higher than the maximum flow rate (50 GPM) posted on the anti-entrapment plan.-Please reassess the swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan and ensure all the entrapment risk are properly evaluated/assessed.Also, email the anti-entrapment plan and its supporting document (Including pool's schematic plumbing diagram, sump diagram and its pipes dimension, drain cover certificate of compliance, and pump specifications) to the district inspection after the reassessment.*Outstanding violation since January 2023.
  9. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The pool water sample collected on October 17, 2024 was not processed as there was no identification number on the bottle.-Please resample.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan onsite was not properly assessed, the operational flow rate obtained from the flow meter at the time of the inspection (73 GPM) was higher than the maximum flow rate (50 GPM) posted on the anti-entrapment plan.-Please reassess the swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan and ensure all the entrapment risk are properly evaluated/assessed.Also, email the anti-entrapment plan and its supporting document (Including pool's schematic plumbing diagram, sump diagram and its pipes dimension, drain cover certificate of compliance, and pump specifications) to the district inspection after the reassessment.
  10. Demand Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Pool water sample collected on April 8, 2024, was not processed because it was received more than 24 hours after collection.-Please resample and ensure to follow proper sample guidelines.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on April 2, 2024, showed HPC at 3400 CFU/mL.-Please treat in accordance with AHS guidelines and resample. A third consecutively unsatisfactory water sample would result in pool closure order.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on March 28, 2024, showed HPC at 220 CFU/mL.-Please resample.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan onsite was not properly assessed, the operational flow rate obtained from the flow meter at the time of the inspection (73 GPM) was higher than the maximum flow rate (50 GPM) posted on the anti-entrapment plan.-Please reassess the swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan and ensure all the entrapment risk are properly evaluated/assessed.Also, email the anti-entrapment plan and its supporting document (Including pool's schematic plumbing diagram, sump diagram and its pipes dimension, drain cover certificate of compliance, and pump specifications) to the district inspection after the reassessment.
  11. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on March 28, 2024, showed HPC at 220 CFU/mL.-Please resample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on April 2, 2024, showed HPC at 3400 CFU/mL.-Please treat in accordance with AHS guidelines and resample. A third consecutively unsatisfactory water sample would result in pool closure order.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan onsite was not properly assessed, the operational flow rate obtained from the flow meter at the time of the inspection (73 GPM) was higher than the maximum flow rate (50 GPM) posted on the anti-entrapment plan.-Please reassess the swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan and ensure all the entrapment risk are properly evaluated/assessed.Also, email the anti-entrapment plan and its supporting document (Including pool's schematic plumbing diagram, sump diagram and its pipes dimension, drain cover certificate of compliance, and pump specifications) to the district inspection after the reassessment.
  12. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on March 28, 2024, showed HPC at 220 CFU/mL.-Please resample.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan onsite was not properly assessed, the operational flow rate obtained from the flow meter at the time of the inspection (73 GPM) was higher than the maximum flow rate (50 GPM) posted on the anti-entrapment plan.-Please reassess the swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan and ensure all the entrapment risk are properly evaluated/assessed.Also, email the anti-entrapment plan and its supporting document (Including pool's schematic plumbing diagram, sump diagram and its pipes dimension, drain cover certificate of compliance, and pump specifications) to the district inspection after the reassessment.
  13. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan onsite was not properly assessed, the operational flow rate obtained from the flow meter at the time of the inspection (73 GPM) was higher than the maximum flow rate (50 GPM) posted on the anti-entrapment plan.-Please reassess the swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan and ensure all the entrapment risk are properly evaluated/assessed.Also, email the anti-entrapment plan and its supporting document (Including pool's schematic plumbing diagram, sump diagram and its pipes dimension, drain cover certificate of compliance, and pump specifications) to the district inspection after the reassessment.
  14. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC was isolated at 670 CFU per mL.-Please treat the pool in accordance with AHS unsatisfactory pool water sample and resubmit water sample, label sample as resample.
  15. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC was isolated at 670 CFU per mL.-Please treat the pool in accordance with AHS unsatisfactory pool water sample and resubmit water sample, label sample as resample.This was unsatisfactory water sample result, not part of the onsite inspection conducted on 2024/01/26.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan onsite was not properly assessed, the operational flow rate obtained from the flow meter at the time of the inspection (73 GPM) was higher than the maximum flow rate (50 GPM) posted on the anti-entrapment plan.-Please reassess the swimming pool anti-entrapment compliance plan and ensure all the entrapment risk are properly evaluated/assessed.Also, email the anti-entrapment plan and its supporting document (Including pool's schematic plumbing diagram, sump diagram and its pipes dimension, drain cover certificate of compliance, and pump specifications) to the district inspection after the reassessment.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website