Skip to content
Loading map…

Panago Pizza - North Shore

3-665 Tranquille Rd Kamloops BC V2B 3J1 · Restaurant - Food Service

Official record from Interior Health →

Inspection summary

Panago Pizza - North Shore has been inspected once by Interior Health Authority, on December 12, 2025. The most recent inspection, on December 12, 2025, recorded 6 infractions.

In the past 12 months there was 1 inspection with 6 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Protecting food from contamination and Pests.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Protecting food from contaminationHigher risk

    This covers how food is stored, prepared and displayed: raw meat kept away from ready-to-eat food, food covered and stored off the floor, and nothing dripping or splashing into it. Cross-contamination from raw to cooked food is a direct route for salmonella and E. coli.

    Recorded once on December 12, 2025. For example: 7 Are foods protected from contamination?

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded once on December 12, 2025. For example: 2 Are proper pest control measures in place on the premises?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, required signage, written procedures and logs. These findings are administrative: the documentation was missing or out of date at the time of inspection.

    Recorded 2 times on December 12, 2025. For example: 3 Are written food handling procedures (Food Safety Plan) current and available on site?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded once on December 12, 2025. For example: 5 Are the FOODSAFE training requirements being met?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on December 12, 2025. For example: 1 Does the facility have proper monitoring supplies?

About this data

These results come from Interior Health Authority, which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

1 inspection

  1. Monitoring

    6 infractions

    • F1.7 Are foods protected from contamination?
      • Observation(s): F1.7 Unsealed bags of dry foods are being stored on the dry goods shelf ( opening of the bags are secured with paper clips for the ff items: multigrain pizza mix, rogers icing sugar)-Operator must ensure that contents of opened bags are transferred to food grade bins with tight fitting, pest-proof lids.
      • F1.7A The operator must ensure that all food on the premises is protected from contamination.
    • F2.1 Does the facility have proper monitoring supplies?
      • Observation(s): F2.1 test strips for Chlorine ( low temp DW) and Quat ammonia ( Kay Clicksan for refilling spray bottles and for manual dishwashing in three comp't sink) were onsite but expired (with expiry date of Jan 2025.) Operator must procure new strips to ensure accurate readings.
      • F2.1A Sanitizer test strips must be available for each chemical sanitizer used at the premises.
    • F2.2 Are proper pest control measures in place on the premises?
      • Observation(s): F2.2 Please read the comments under F1.7 above.
      • F2.2A The premises must be maintained to prevent harbouring (sheltering) or breeding of pests.
    • F3.3 Are written food handling procedures (Food Safety Plan) current and available on site?
      • F3.3A Operator must have written food handling procedures that includes all potentially hazardous foods on site.
      • F3.3B Operator must maintain written food handling procedures that includes all potentially hazardous foods.
      • F3.3C Written food handling procedures must identify all critical control points.
      • F3.3D Written food handling procedures must include critical limits for all critical control points.
      • F3.3E Written food handling procedures must include procedures to be followed to ensure adherence to the critical limits.
      • F3.3F Written food handling procedures must include the actions to be taken in the event the critical limits are not adhered to.
    • F3.4 Are written sanitation procedures (Sanitation Plan) current and available on site?
      • F3.4A Written sanitation procedures must include cleaning and sanitizing requirements for the establishment and all equipment and utensils.
      • F3.4B Written sanitation procedures must include a list of all cleaning and sanitizing agents, including their concentration and uses.
      • F3.4C Written sanitation procedures must include a list of all pesticides used in the establishment, including uses and storage requirements.
    • F3.5 Are the FOODSAFE training requirements being met?
      • Observation(s): Arpandeep S. ( Owner/Operator) holds a FS certificate, however he left the premises and the employee working by himself (RS) does not hold a valid FS1 certificate ( or FOODSAFE-equivalent certificate).
      • F3.6B In the absence of the operator, at least one employee present in the establishment must have valid FOODSAFE certificate or equivalent training.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website