Skip to content
Loading map…

Radhika - The Brow Queen

32 - 905 172 Street SW Edmonton AB T6W 1A5 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Radhika - The Brow Queen has been inspected 2 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since March 3, 2026. The most recent inspection, on March 4, 2026, found no infractions.

1 of 2 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 6 infractions recorded. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 3 times on March 3, 2026. For example: Is single-use or uncleanable equipment being used as intended (Critical)?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 2 times on March 3, 2026. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on March 3, 2026. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

2 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Initial Inspection

    6 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services, antiseptic use, and accidental cuts were available.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation for sterile equipment was not retained with the clients' records. Ensure that sterility assurance documentation for all critical equipment used during services is retained with clients' forms. Discussed.
    • 13. Is single-use or uncleanable equipment being used as intended (Critical)?
      • Sharp re-usable tools used for extractions during facials were observed. Ensure that all sharp tools used for extractions are discarded after one use. They were discarded during the inspection.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Re-usable extraction loops were observed during the inspection (semi-critical tools), which were not properly cleaned and disinfected between the clients:a. No high-level disinfectant was available for disinfection, as required. b. No test strips to test the concentration of the high-level disinfectant were available. c. No soaking tray for disinfection in high-level disinfectant was available.d. No designated reprocessing sink was available - the only available sink was located in the bathroom. If re-usable semi-critical tools are used, all issues noted above must be addressed. The re-usable extractors were discarded during the inspection.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • One cosmetic product did not have an appropriate label. It was discarded during the inspection. Ensure that all cosmetic products have appropriate labels.
    • 30. Is the reprocessing area of a personal service facility that uses reusable equipment properly designed, managed and maintained to ensure the safety of clients?
      • Re-usable extraction loops were observed during the inspection (semi-critical tools), which were not properly cleaned and disinfected between the clients:a. No high-level disinfectant was available for disinfection, as required. b. No test strips to test the concentration of the high-level disinfectant were available. c. No soaking tray for disinfection in high-level disinfectant was available.d. No designated reprocessing sink was available - the only available sink was located in the bathroom. If re-usable semi-critical tools are used, all issues noted above must be addressed. The re-usable extractors were discarded during the inspection.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website