Skip to content
Loading map…

Rhe Studio

2859 Anderson Place SW Edmonton AB T6W 0V7 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Rhe Studio has been inspected 4 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since March 3, 2026. The most recent inspection, on March 9, 2026, found no infractions.

1 of 4 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 4 inspections with 11 infractions recorded. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 5 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on March 5, 2026. For example: Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 5 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on March 4, 2026. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on March 3, 2026. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

4 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • No complete sterility documentation was available for needles used for microneedling (no lot was available). Ensure that all sterile instruments have proper sterility documentation.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services, antiseptic use, and accidental cuts were available. Skin cleansing procedure and accidental cut procedure were completed during the inspection.
    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • No complete sterility documentation was available for needles used for microneedling (no lot was available). Ensure that all sterile instruments have proper sterility documentation.
  4. Initial Inspection

    8 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services, antiseptic use, and accidental cuts were available. Skin cleansing procedure and accidental cut procedure were completed during the inspection.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • Unacceptable antiseptic product was used for skin preparation: no DIN or NPN was available.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation for sterile equipment was not retained with the clients' records. Ensure that sterility assurance documentation for all critical equipment used during services is retained with clients' forms. Discussed.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Clients' records did not include contact information for the clients.
    • 13. Is single-use or uncleanable equipment being used as intended (Critical)?
      • Sharp re-usable tools used for extractions during facials were observed. Ensure that all sharp tools used for extractions are discarded after one use.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • A product used for disinfection of microneedling machine did not have a DIN. Approved disinfectant is required. Preempt RTU was available and will be used instead.
    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • No complete sterility documentation was available for needles used for microneedling (no lot was available). Ensure that all sterile instruments have proper sterility documentation.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Some cosmetic products did not have appropriate labels: some bottles were unlabelled, and the serums did not have ingredients listed. Ensure that all cosmetic products have appropriate labels.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website