Skip to content
Loading map…

Sierras Of Tuscany - Swimming Pool

223 Tuscany Springs Boulevard NW Calgary AB T3L 2M2 · Aquatic Facility

Inspection summary

Sierras Of Tuscany - Swimming Pool has been inspected 4 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since November 21, 2023. The most recent inspection, on August 31, 2026, recorded 1 infraction.

None of the 4 inspections on record were free of infractions. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 4 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 5 times across 4 separate inspections, most recently on August 31, 2026. For example: Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

4 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Repeat violation cited on March 19, 2026:The automated controller pH reading was at 8.7 while the manual test result was at 7.27.Replace the automated controller so the automated controller correlates with the manual reading.***Repeated violations, noted on 2022 report and prior.1. The automated controller pH reading was at 8.67 while the manual test result was at 7.30.*The automated controller must be replaced as recalibration is not effective.
  2. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample (26ES-239E00118) collected on August 27th, 2026, was rejected by the lab as the date and time of collection was not recorded on the requisition form. Please resample the swimming pool as soon as possible.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Repeat violation cited on March 19, 2026:The automated controller pH reading was at 8.7 while the manual test result was at 7.27.Replace the automated controller so the automated controller correlates with the manual reading.***Repeated violations, noted on 2022 report and prior.1. The automated controller pH reading was at 8.67 while the manual test result was at 7.30.*The automated controller must be replaced as recalibration is not effective.
  3. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Repeat violation cited on March 19, 2026:The automated controller pH reading was at 8.7 while the manual test result was at 7.27.Replace the automated controller so the automated controller correlates with the manual reading.***Repeated violations, noted on 2022 report and prior.1. The automated controller pH reading was at 8.67 while the manual test result was at 7.30.*The automated controller must be replaced as recalibration is not effective.
  4. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • ***Repeated violations, noted on 2022 report and prior.1. The automated controller pH reading was at 8.67 while the manual test result was at 7.30.*The automated controller must be replaced as recalibration is not effective.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website