Skip to content
Loading map…

612 111 Street SW - Swimming Pool

612 111 Street SW Edmonton AB T6W 1R9 · Aquatic Facility

Inspection summary

612 111 Street SW - Swimming Pool has been inspected 7 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since April 24, 2024. The most recent inspection, on July 30, 2026, found no infractions.

1 of 7 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 5 inspections with 7 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 8 times across 6 separate inspections, most recently on July 27, 2026. For example: Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on June 23, 2026. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.

    Recorded once on April 30, 2025. For example: Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

7 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 6.94 and the manual reading pH 7.48. Updated on June 10, 2026:* There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 7.14 and the manual reading pH 7.44 (from the automated controller). Updated on June 23, 2026:* There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 6.99 and the manual reading pH 7.38 (PHI) and 7.35 (operator) (from the automated controller). Updated on July 27, 2026:* There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 6.82 and the manual reading pH 7.28 (from the automated controller).Note: the operator's test kit showed the "Sensor Error" message after attempted re-test. Please ensure that the test kit operates properly.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 48 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm. Updated on June 23, 2026:* Total alkalinity was 42 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 6.94 and the manual reading pH 7.48. Updated on June 10, 2026:* There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 7.14 and the manual reading pH 7.44 (from the automated controller). Updated on June 23, 2026:* There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 6.99 and the manual reading pH 7.38 (PHI) and 7.35 (operator) (from the automated controller).
  4. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity was 48 ppm. Ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60 and 180 ppm.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 6.94 and the manual reading pH 7.48. Updated on June 10, 2026:* There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 7.14 and the manual reading pH 7.44 (from the automated controller).
    • 10. Are general nuisance conditions, other than those noted in other violations, being prevented at this pool (Non-Critical)?
      • The pool water temperature was over 30C (system reading 30.7C, and manual reading about 30.1C). Ensure that the temperature is maintained under 30C, or request the testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the requisition form for the water samples, as required for pools maintained over 30C.
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 6.94 and the manual reading pH 7.48.
  6. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 6.94 and the manual reading pH 7.48.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • Hayward 9x9 covers, installed on January 5, 2023, expire on January 5, 2030, were reported (according to the email note received on February 2, 2023), but no updated Anti-Entrapment Compliance Plan was submitted. Please update the plan and submit an updated version to our office.
  7. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • There was a discrepancy between the automated controller reading for pH 6.83 and the manual reading pH 7.48. It was addressed during hte inspection.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Rate of filtration for the filtration system was 16.32 gpm/sq ft based on a filtration area of 4.91 sq ft and flow rate 80 gpm. The flow rate was lowered to 70 gpm during the inspection, which resulted in rate of filtration 14.29 gpm/ sq ft (acceptable).

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website