Skip to content
Loading map…

Canalta High River - Pool

1512 13 Avenue SE High River AB T1V 2B1 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Canalta High River - Pool has been inspected 24 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since January 11, 2024. The most recent inspection, on September 9, 2026, found no infractions.

9 of 24 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 1 infraction recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Food temperature control.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 17 times across 14 separate inspections, most recently on November 10, 2025. For example: Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Inspectors check that anything that has to be kept at a set temperature, such as chilled or hot food, or equipment like sterilizers, stays in its safe range and that accurate thermometers are on hand. With food, temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on May 28, 2024. For example: Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

24 inspections

  1. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 11/10. The flow rate for the pool was 65GPM and the turnover period was 5 hours. All pools built after 2006 must have a turnover of 4 hours or less. The flow rate was increased to 82GPM and the turnover period was 4.03 hours.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 9/11. The bacterial water sample submitted on September 9, 2025, was unsatisfactory. - TC absent. - HPC1480 CFU/mL. Treat pool as necessary and resample.
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The bacterial water sample submitted on August 18th, 2025, was unsatisfactory. TC: AbsentHPC: 9000 CFU/mLPool operator stated that they had an issue with the disinfection on the August 18th. This has been addressed.
  7. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The bacterial water sample submitted August 5, 2025 had an HPC count of 120 CFU/mL. - Pool chemistry to be balanced and a satisfactory water sample submitted.
  9. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The bacterial water sample submitted on July 3 was unsatisfactory. - HPC was 110 CFU/mLOperator stated that the filter was clogged. Filter was backwashed. Water chemistry was balanced and a resample will be submitted.
  11. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  12. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 12/17. New floating weirs were obtained and flow was adjusted. Two out of the three skimmers had proper skimming action. The floating weir for the skimmer by the emergency exit was still floating too high.  10/31. The flow to the skimmers adjusted. The floating weirs are still too high. 10/18. The floating weirs for the skimmers located closest to the doors were floating too high. The floating weirs need to be lowered in order to allow for proper skimming action to occur.
  13. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 1) The bacteriological water sample submitted on December 23, 2024 was unsatisfactory. - The heterotrophic plate count was 57,000CFU/mL. 2) The bacteriological water sample submitted on December 30, 2024 was unsatisfactory. - The heterotrophic plate count was 800CFU/mL. Treat the pool as necessary, balance water chemistry, and resample.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 12/17. New floating weirs were obtained and flow was adjusted. Two out of the three skimmers had proper skimming action. The floating weir for the skimmer by the emergency exit was still floating too high.  10/31. The flow to the skimmers adjusted. The floating weirs are still too high. 10/18. The floating weirs for the skimmers located closest to the doors were floating too high. The floating weirs need to be lowered in order to allow for proper skimming action to occur.
  14. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 1) The bacteriological water sample submitted on December 23, 2024 was unsatisfactory. - The heterotrophic plate count was 57,000CFU/mL. 2) The bacteriological water sample submitted on December 30, 2024 was unsatisfactory. - The heterotrophic plate count was 800CFU/mL. Treat the pool as necessary, balance water chemistry, and resample.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 12/17. New floating weirs were obtained and flow was adjusted. Two out of the three skimmers had proper skimming action. The floating weir for the skimmer by the emergency exit was still floating too high.  10/31. The flow to the skimmers adjusted. The floating weirs are still too high. 10/18. The floating weirs for the skimmers located closest to the doors were floating too high. The floating weirs need to be lowered in order to allow for proper skimming action to occur.
  15. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The bacteriological water sample submitted on December 23, 2024 was unsatisfactory. - The heterotrophic plate count was 57,000CFU/mL. Treat the pool as necessary, balance water chemistry, and resample.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 12/17. New floating weirs were obtained and flow was adjusted. Two out of the three skimmers had proper skimming action. The floating weir for the skimmer by the emergency exit was still floating too high.  10/31. The flow to the skimmers adjusted. The floating weirs are still too high. 10/18. The floating weirs for the skimmers located closest to the doors were floating too high. The floating weirs need to be lowered in order to allow for proper skimming action to occur.
  16. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 12/17. New floating weirs were obtained and flow was adjusted. Two out of the three skimmers had proper skimming action. The floating weir for the skimmer by the emergency exit was still floating too high.  10/31. The flow to the skimmers adjusted. The floating weirs are still too high. 10/18. The floating weirs for the skimmers located closest to the doors were floating too high. The floating weirs need to be lowered in order to allow for proper skimming action to occur.
  17. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 10/31. The flow to the skimmers adjusted. The floating weirs are still too high. 10/18. The floating weirs for the skimmers located closest to the doors were floating too high. The floating weirs need to be lowered in order to allow for proper skimming action to occur.
  18. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The floating weirs for the skimmers located closest to the doors were floating too high. The floating weirs need to be lowered in order to allow for proper skimming action to occur.
  19. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  20. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • There was a build-up of algae at the bottom of the basin of the pool near the emergency exit and near the slide.
  21. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  22. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • A bacteriological water sample was submitted on May 7th, 2024. The sample was unsatisfactory.- HPC 370 cfu/mL- TC absentPlease treat the pool and resample.
  23. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  24. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 06. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Critical)?
      • The floating weir in the skimmers near the emergency exit and the slide were floating too high and not allowing for proper skimming action.Repair/replace the floating weirs to ensure proper skimming action.
    • 14. Is the pool maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, good repair and are temperatures being properly regulated?
      • There was a build-up of algae at the bottom of the pool basin near the slide and emergency exit.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website