Skip to content
Loading map…

Coast Nisku Inn & Conference Centre - Hot Tub

1101 4 Street Nisku AB T9E 7N1 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Coast Nisku Inn & Conference Centre - Hot Tub has been inspected 37 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since November 9, 2023. The most recent inspection, on October 15, 2026, found no infractions.

13 of 37 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 14 inspections with 7 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 19 times across 19 separate inspections, most recently on September 25, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 2 times on July 29, 2024. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.

    Recorded 10 times across 10 separate inspections, most recently on June 17, 2024. For example: Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

37 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Pseudomonas isolated from a sample submitted on September 23.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliform isolation from a sample submitted on August 26.
  5. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliform isolation from a sample submitted on August 26.
  6. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC isolated from a sample submitted on July 20 (partial results available at the time). Treatment required.
  9. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Pseudomonas was isolated from a sample submitted on June 29. Operator directed to treat the basin and resample
  11. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  12. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 290 HPC isolated from a sample submitted on May 25.Resample required
  13. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  14. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC present in a sample submitted on April 7, 2026.
  15. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  16. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  17. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 260 HPC present in a sample submitted in September 15, 2025
  18. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  19. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Pseudomonas present in a sample submitted on January 30th/2025. Directed the basin be closed for Pseudomonas treatment.
  20. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  21. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  22. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC present in a sample submitted on September 18. The operator was directed to shock chlorinate the pool
  23. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 260HPC present in a sample collected on July 23. Resample required
  24. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 260HPC present in a sample collected on July 23. Resample required
    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • ** FCL = 0.5ppm; TCL = 1.71ppm: pH = 7.05ORP = 741mVACTION REQUIRED:1) Maintain free chlorine at 2ppm
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • ** Combine chlorine was at 1.21ppm- ALK = 77ppm.ACTION REQUIRED1) super chlorinate the pool to break the high combine chlorine.2) Maintain combine chlorine levels as low as possible, recommend keeping it below 0.5ppm
  25. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 260HPC present in a sample collected on July 23. Resample required
  26. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  27. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  28. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC present in a sample submitted on June 4thOperator directed to shock chlorinate and resample
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  29. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Pseudomonas isolated from a sample submitted on May 5. Discuss results with Kamal. Treatment procedure for Pseudomonas discussed with Kamal
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  30. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  31. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC present in a sample submitted on March 6. Recommended shock chlorination of the basin
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  32. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  33. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  34. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 160HPC present in a sample submitted on January 16
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  35. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  36. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Turnover = 880gal/92gpm = 9.6 minutes**Filtration rate = 92gpm/7.06sq.ft = 13gpm/sq.ft. The filtration rate is too fast and not compliant with the pool standard. The filtration rate for a hot tub/whirlpool shall not exceed 12.5gpm/sq.ftACTION REQUIRED1) Reduce your flow rate to 75GPM to achieve compliance.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  37. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC present in a sample submitted on November 7th. Recommended shock chlorination of the hot tub

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website