Skip to content
Loading map…

Coast Nisku Inn & Conference Centre - Swimming Pool

1101 4 Street Nisku AB T9E 7N1 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Coast Nisku Inn & Conference Centre - Swimming Pool has been inspected 30 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since November 9, 2023. The most recent inspection, on August 28, 2026, recorded 1 infraction.

13 of 30 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 11 inspections with 5 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 16 times across 15 separate inspections, most recently on August 28, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.

    Recorded 6 times across 6 separate inspections, most recently on July 8, 2024. For example: Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

30 inspections

  1. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC are recorded 180 CFU per ml.
  2. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC present in a sample submitted on August 11. Manager, Kamal directed to shock chlorinate the basin and resample
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC isolated in a sample submitted on July20.
  7. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  8. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC level is recorded 560 (H). Operator is advised to take appropriate measures and submit a re-sample immediately.
  9. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  11. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliforms present in a sample submitted on March 24.
  12. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  13. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 06. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Critical)?
      • The pump was off at the time of the inspection. The operator stated that they pump has been intermittently shutting off by itself for the past one week. Upon further investigation, the operator discovered that the lint basket was clogged with hair. The operator changed the lint basket and restarted the pump. At the end of the inspection, the pump was operational.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • **The water clarity in the pool was poor. The main drains at the bottom of the pool could not be seen from the pool deck. The cause of the poor clarity was due to pump failure, which was rectified during the inspection. The operator was directed to keep bathers out of the pool until clarity returns to normal.
  14. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  15. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 2290HPC present in a sample submitted on September 3, 2025.Operator directed to resample.
  16. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  17. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC at 540 for sample submitted on July 2, m2025
  18. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  19. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliforms present in a sample submitted on April 16/2025. The manager was directed to shock chlorinate the pool and resample after.
  20. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  21. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  22. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  23. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC >100 in a sample submitted July 3. Operator directed to shock chlorinate and resample.
  24. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC >100 in a sample submitted July 3. Operator directed to shock chlorinate and resample.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  25. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC present in a sample submitted on June 24. Operator directed to shock chlorinate and resample
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  26. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  27. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 750 HPC present in a sample submitted on April 17
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  28. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 750 HPC present in a sample submitted on April 17
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  29. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  30. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result, TC present in a sample submitted on November 7. Recommended shock chlorination of the pool basin.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website