Skip to content
Loading map…

Coast Nisku Inn & Conference Centre - Swimming Pool

1101 4 Street Nisku AB T9E 7N1 · Aquatic Facility

29 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC level is recorded 560 (H). Operator is advised to take appropriate measures and submit a re-sample immediately.
  3. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  5. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliforms present in a sample submitted on March 24.
  6. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  7. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 06. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Critical)?
      • The pump was off at the time of the inspection. The operator stated that they pump has been intermittently shutting off by itself for the past one week. Upon further investigation, the operator discovered that the lint basket was clogged with hair. The operator changed the lint basket and restarted the pump. At the end of the inspection, the pump was operational.
    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • **The water clarity in the pool was poor. The main drains at the bottom of the pool could not be seen from the pool deck. The cause of the poor clarity was due to pump failure, which was rectified during the inspection. The operator was directed to keep bathers out of the pool until clarity returns to normal.
  8. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  9. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 2290HPC present in a sample submitted on September 3, 2025.Operator directed to resample.
  10. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  11. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC at 540 for sample submitted on July 2, m2025
  12. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  13. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Total coliforms present in a sample submitted on April 16/2025. The manager was directed to shock chlorinate the pool and resample after.
  14. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  15. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  16. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  17. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC >100 in a sample submitted July 3. Operator directed to shock chlorinate and resample.
  18. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC >100 in a sample submitted July 3. Operator directed to shock chlorinate and resample.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  19. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • TC present in a sample submitted on June 24. Operator directed to shock chlorinate and resample
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  20. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  21. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 750 HPC present in a sample submitted on April 17
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  22. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 750 HPC present in a sample submitted on April 17
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  23. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • - The anti-entrapment plan that was submitted by the pool operator had inaccurate information, which do not reflect what the inspector observed on site. The operator was directed to resubmit the anti-entrapment plan with the correct information.FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED:1) Please ensure the written policy/response procedure for failed water sample and fecal contamination of the pool are well established and made easily accessible to the pool operator when needed.
  24. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Unsatisfactory water result, TC present in a sample submitted on November 7. Recommended shock chlorination of the pool basin.
  25. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  26. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 2900 HPC present in a sample collected on Sept 5HPC present again in a sample submitted on September 18. Shock chlorination recommended.
  27. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 2900 HPC present in a sample collected on Sept 5
  28. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 570 HPC present in a sample collected on July 19
  29. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • 570 HPC present in a sample collected on July 19