Skip to content
Loading map…

Good Skin Clinic

6349 Sandin Way NW Edmonton AB T6R 0K1 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Good Skin Clinic has been inspected 4 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since July 23, 2025. The most recent inspection, on January 7, 2026, recorded 3 infractions.

1 of 4 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 22 infractions recorded. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 10 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on December 22, 2025. For example: Is post-service care provided by personal service workers following any personal service or accident where a client's skin or mucous membrane is cut or punctured during a personal service, or when energy-emitting equipment is used?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 7 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on January 7, 2026. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded 5 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on January 7, 2026. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

4 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services and antiseptic use were available.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation for sterile equipment was not retained with the clients' records. Ensure that sterility assurance documentation for all critical equipment used during services is retained with clients' forms.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Manufacturer's instructions for use of cosmetic products were not being followed: bacteriostatic saline was being used for reconstitution, while manufacturer requires a preservative-free saline be used. Please obtain and use preservative-free saline and discard bacteriostatic saline.
  2. Risk Management Inspection

    9 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services and antiseptic use were available.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • Unacceptable antiseptic product was used for skin preparation: Stanhexidine expired in October 2025. Acceptable alcohol swabs were available.
    • 11. Is post-service care provided by personal service workers following any personal service or accident where a client's skin or mucous membrane is cut or punctured during a personal service, or when energy-emitting equipment is used?
      • No written post-treatment care instructions were available for injections services.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Cavicide wipes expired on May 1, 2021, and Clorox wipes (hydrogen peroxide-based) expired in June 2022. Please obtain an appropriate disinfectant for surface disinfection.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No approved disinfectant has been used or available for tweezers disinfection. Approved high-level disinfectant is required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No soaking tray was available for disinfection of the tweezers. The semi-critical tools must be disinfected by soaking in a high-level disinfectant.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 1. No records of testing of high-level disinfectant were available, and no testing of disinfectant has been conducted as required.2. No test strips were available to test the concentration of high-level disinfectant. Obtain the appropriate strips.
    • 24. Are waste sharps disposed of properly?
      • Sharps disposal was inappropriate: needles were discarded into a plastic container and not appropriate sharps container.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Manufacturer's instructions for use of cosmetic products were not being followed: a. bacteriostatic saline was being used for reconstitution, while manufacturer requires a preservative-free saline be used. Please obtain and use preservative-free saline.b. Some serums were expired. Please discard.c. Numbing cream was expired. Obrain a new numbing cream.
  3. Monitoring Inspection

    10 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services and antiseptic use were available.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • Unacceptable antiseptic product was used for skin preparation: Stanhexidine expired in October 2025. Acceptable alcohol swabs were available.
    • 11. Is post-service care provided by personal service workers following any personal service or accident where a client's skin or mucous membrane is cut or punctured during a personal service, or when energy-emitting equipment is used?
      • No written post-treatment care instructions were available for injections services.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation for sterile equipment was not retained with the clients' records. Ensure that sterility assurance documentation for all critical equipment used during services is retained with clients' forms.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No approved disinfectant has been used or available for tweezers disinfection. Approved high-level disinfectant is required.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • No soaking tray was available for disinfection of the tweezers. The semi-critical tools must be disinfected by soaking in a high-level disinfectant.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 1. No records of testing of high-level disinfectant were available, and no testing of disinfectant has been conducted as required.2. No test strips were available to test the concentration of high-level disinfectant. Obtain the appropriate strips.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Cavicide wipes expired on May 1, 2021, and Clorox wipes (hydrogen peroxide-based) expired in June 2022. Please obtain an appropriate disinfectant for surface disinfection.
    • 24. Are waste sharps disposed of properly?
      • Sharps disposal was inappropriate: needles were discarded into a plastic container and not appropriate sharps container.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Manufacturer's instructions for use of cosmetic products were not being followed: a. bacteriostatic saline was being used for reconstitution, while manufacturer requires a preservative-free saline be used. Please obtain and use preservative-free saline.b. Some serums were expired. Please discard.c. Numbing cream was expired. Obrain a new numbing cream.
  4. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website