Skip to content
Loading map…

Half Moon Lake Resort - Outdoor Pool

21524 Township Road 520 Sherwood Park AB T8E 1E5 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Half Moon Lake Resort - Outdoor Pool has been inspected 25 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since June 19, 2024. The most recent inspection, on August 18, 2026, recorded 1 infraction.

9 of 25 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 9 inspections with 6 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 17 times across 16 separate inspections, most recently on August 18, 2026. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

25 inspections

  1. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The water sample results for sample collected on August 04, 2026:HPC: 430The water sample results for sample collected on August 11, 2026:HPC: 680
  2. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The water sample results for sample collected on August 04, 2026:HPC: 430The water sample results for sample collected on August 11, 2026:HPC: 680
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  4. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The water sample results for sample collected on August 04, 2026:HPC: 430
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample results for the sample that was collected on July 21, 2026: HPC: 1,900
  7. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Sample collected on June 23th HPC: 57,000 and 320 CFU/mL
  8. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Sample collected on June 16th HPC: 2,670.
  9. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Heterotrophic Plate Count from sample collected on August 13 was 250 CFU/mL.Heterotrophic Plate Count from sample collected on August 20 was 510 CFU/mL.Heterotrophic Plate Count from sample collected on August 27 was 220CFU/mL. and 990 CFU/mL.
  11. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Heterotrophic Plate Count from sample collected on August 13 was 250 CFU/mL.Heterotrophic Plate Count from sample collected on August 20 was 510 CFU/mL.
  12. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Heterotrophic Plate Count from sample collected on August 13 was 250 CFU/mL.
  13. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  14. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Heterotrophic Plate Count from sample collected on July 14 was 950 CFU/mL.
  15. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  16. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  17. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  18. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC>57000 in a sample collected on July 23. The operator is directed to resample.
  19. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC>57000 in a sample collected on July 23. The operator is directed to resample.
  20. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC>57000 in a sample collected on July 23. The operator is directed to resample.
  21. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  22. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC >100 in a sample collected on July 4th. Operator contacted to resample.
  23. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • HPC >100 in a sample collected on July 4th. Operator contacted to resample.
  24. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  25. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • >57000HPC present in a sample submitted on June 17. The operator stated that they were experiencing very low chlorine readings and had been working to resolved it. At the time of the inspection, pool chemistry was satisfactory. The operator will resample.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Flow rate = 125gpmPool volume = 46230galTurnover = 46230gal/125gpm/60 = 6.2hoursThe operator was directed to increase the flow rate to a minimum of 192gpm to achieve a turnover of four hours. Before the PHI left side, the operator had achieved the required flow rate of 192gpm.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website