Skip to content
Loading map…

Lash Common

16912 107 Avenue NW Edmonton AB T5P 4C3 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Lash Common has been inspected 5 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since December 12, 2023. The most recent inspection, on February 17, 2026, found no infractions.

2 of 5 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 3 inspections with 3 infractions recorded. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 4 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on February 9, 2026. For example: Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded once on February 9, 2026. For example: Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Some jurisdictions require operators to complete infection-prevention training, or to hold specific qualifications for higher-risk services such as tattooing, piercing or electrolysis. These findings mean the training record was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean a client was put at risk.

    Recorded once on January 24, 2024. For example: Do operators and personal services workers comply with the Personal Services Regulation and Standards and do they have the skills and knowledge to perform their duties in a safe and sanitary manner?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on January 24, 2024. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

5 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation was not recorded with client record for single use sterile items used in the facility.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • 1. Uncertainty of what high-level disinfecting solution was being used as no bulk supply was available. 2. No high-level disinfection test strips were available. 3. No written records for testing the high-level disinfection solution. 4. Daily testing of the high-level disinfecting solution was not performed.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation was not recorded with client record for single use sterile items used in the facility.
  4. Monitoring Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • Facility specific written procedures were not completed. AHS template for facility specific written procedures was provided to complete and send copies to PHI via email.
    • 06. Do operators and personal services workers comply with the Personal Services Regulation and Standards and do they have the skills and knowledge to perform their duties in a safe and sanitary manner?
      • 1-Personal service worker failed in reading labeled instructions for disinfectants, and cosmetics Ensure the before use date for tinting all products are marked on the products.2-Oxiver disinfectant in the spray bottle was diluted 2:1 ratio. Ensure all disinfectants are used in accordance with manufacturer's instructions for use.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation was not recorded with client record for single use sterile items used in the facility.Ensure the batch number, lot number expiry etc. are recorded with the client consent form.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Hard wax was reported to be topped up.Ensure the there is no top up of any products. Clean, and wash containers before refill.
  5. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website