Skip to content
Loading map…

Mybrow Yeg

2362 Casselman Crescent SW Edmonton AB T6W 0W3 · Personal Services

Inspection summary

Mybrow Yeg has been inspected 4 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since March 3, 2025. The most recent inspection, on March 17, 2025, found no infractions.

1 of 4 inspections on record found no infractions at all. No inspections are on record from the past 12 months. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    The premises needs a working hand sink, a separate sink for cleaning instruments where required, cleanable surfaces, and good lighting and ventilation. Upkeep problems are usually lower risk on their own, but they make thorough cleaning harder.

    Recorded 3 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on March 13, 2025. For example: Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 3 times on March 3, 2025. For example: Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 2 times on March 3, 2025. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Some jurisdictions require operators to complete infection-prevention training, or to hold specific qualifications for higher-risk services such as tattooing, piercing or electrolysis. These findings mean the training record was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean a client was put at risk.

    Recorded once on March 3, 2025. For example: Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded 3 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on March 11, 2025. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

4 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 29. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?
      • The work surfaces in the service area were not washable. Please provide washable surfaces in the service room.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Numbing cream did not have an appropriate label. Please obtain a new numbing cream.
    • 29. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?
      • The work surfaces in the service area were not washable. Please provide washable surfaces in the service room.
  4. Monitoring Inspection

    9 infractions

    • 02. Has the operator notified the RHA of the existence of a personal service business, including contact and location information, as well as all personal services currently offered or new personal services that will be offered for facilities and/or special events?
      • The owner of the personal service business did not submit a notification about the business to the Alberta Health Services. Submitted during the inspection.
    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • No written procedures for skin cleansing prior to services and antiseptic use were available.
    • 10. Is cleansing and antisepsis of skin and mucous membrane performed in accordance to written procedures and are suitable products being used?
      • Unacceptable antiseptic products were used for skin preparation prior to microblading: the alcohol swabs expired in 2017. Addressed during the inspection: new alcohol swabs were available.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Cavicide used for surface and microblading handle expired on March 1, 2025. Please obtain a new disinfectant.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • Preempt CS20 expired in 2023. However, now single-use plastic tweezers were used for eyelash extensions - no reprocessing.
    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • Some needles did not have appropriate sterility assurance documentation. Addressed during the inspection - needles were discarded. Other acceptable needles were available.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Some pigments were used against manufacturer's instructions. They were discarded during the inspection.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • Numbing cream did not have an appropriate label. Please obtain a new numbing cream.
    • 29. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained to allow for the safe and sanitary provision of personal services (Non-Critical)?
      • The work surfaces in the service area were not washable. Please provide washable surfaces in the service room.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website