Skip to content
Loading map…

Shane Homes YMCA at Rocky Ridge - Leisure Pool

11300 Rocky Ridge Road NW Calgary AB T3G 5H3 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Shane Homes YMCA at Rocky Ridge - Leisure Pool has been inspected 21 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since November 23, 2023. The most recent inspection, on July 8, 2026, found no infractions.

2 of 21 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 4 inspections with 7 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality and Chemicals and toxic substances.

The last 2 inspections in a row found no infractions. The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 37 times across 19 separate inspections, most recently on December 8, 2025. For example: Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 8 times across 8 separate inspections, most recently on December 8, 2025. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

21 inspections

  1. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Monitoring Inspection

    0 infractions

  3. Demand Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on 05/12/2025, tested positive for TC.Treat and resample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on 05/12/2025, tested positive for TC.Treat and resample.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity measured 40 ppm.Adjust the TA to measure between 60 to 180 ppm 0r mg/L
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Previous violations:1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  4. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on 13/11/2025 was rejected because the sample was received more than 24 hours after collection.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity measured 40 ppm.Adjust the TA to measure between 60 to 180 ppm 0r mg/L
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Previous violations:1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  5. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on 22/08/2025 had a HPC of 260 CFC/ml.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity measured 40 ppm.Adjust the TA to measure between 60 to 180 ppm 0r mg/L
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Previous violations:1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  6. Risk Management Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sampled collected on 01/08/2025, tested positive for TC.Treat and resample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sampled collected on 01/08/2025, had a HPC of 750 CFU/mL.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity measured 40 ppm.Adjust the TA to measure between 60 to 180 ppm 0r mg/L
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Previous violations:1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  7. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Recurring violation:Water sample collected on 17/07/2025 had a HPC of 4560 CFU/mL.Previous violation:Water sample collected on 14/07/2025 had a HPC of 120 CFU/mL.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity measured 40 ppm.Adjust the TA to measure between 60 to 180 ppm 0r mg/L
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Previous violations:1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  8. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample collected on 14/07/2025 had a HPC of 120CFC/mL.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity measured 40 ppm.Adjust the TA to measure between 60 to 180 ppm 0r mg/L
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Previous violations:1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  9. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Requisition had conflicting Collection Site information. Please recollect as required. Collection site provided as LP.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity measured 40 ppm.Adjust the TA to measure between 60 to 180 ppm 0r mg/L
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Previous violations:1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  10. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Total alkalinity measured 40 ppm.Adjust the TA to measure between 60 to 180 ppm 0r mg/L
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Previous violations:1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  11. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  12. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Septemebr 24, 2024 sample had total coliforms present. Treat and resample.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  13. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  14. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • WC-0015119March 12, 2024 sample had Total Coliforms present.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • March 6, 2024 results had 440 CFU/mLMarch 19, 2024 results had 650 CFU/mL
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  15. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • WC-0015119March 12, 2024 sample had Total Coliforms present.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  16. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • WC-24-0009384Feb 13 Sample had TC present
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Jan 31 sample came back with HPC 560 cfu/mL
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  17. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Jan 31 sample came back with HPC 560 cfu/mL
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  18. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Dec 19, 2023 sample had HPC of 330 CFU/mL. Resample.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  19. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  20. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Sample not processed, no date and time of collection provided. Resample.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).
  21. Monitoring Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • 1. System readings demonstrate the pH to be 7,79, while manual readings showed pH to be 7.23. Please recalibrate system to ensure that there is only a 0.2-0.3 difference between the system and actual readings. 2. Filtration rate for the leisure pool exceeded maximum filtration rate. Please reduce flow such that it does not exceed filtration rate of 15 gpm/sq.ft. (~750 gpm flow rate).

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website