Skip to content
Loading map…

Wyndham Garden Edmonton Airport - Hot Tub

8016 Sparrow Drive Leduc AB T9E 7G2 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Wyndham Garden Edmonton Airport - Hot Tub has been inspected 12 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since April 23, 2024. The most recent inspection, on October 13, 2026, recorded 2 infractions.

1 of 12 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 9 inspections with 25 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Chemicals and toxic substances and Pool and spa water quality.

Recent inspections have recorded more infractions than earlier ones, so it is worth reading the latest reports closely.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Chemicals and toxic substancesHigher risk

    Pool chemicals such as chlorine and acid must be labelled, stored apart from each other and handled safely. Mixing them by mistake can release toxic gas, so storage and handling problems are treated seriously.

    Recorded 16 times across 9 separate inspections, most recently on October 9, 2026. For example: Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 15 times across 8 separate inspections, most recently on October 13, 2026. For example: Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

12 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The pH reading from the automated controller (8.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.33). October 7, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (9.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.74). October 8, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (7.8) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (OR). October 9, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (7.8) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (OR). October 13, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (8.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.17). Please ensure there is no significant discrepancy.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The filtration rate was Filtration Rate was 15 gpm/sq.ft (75gpm/5sq.ft).
  2. Risk Management Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The pH was 7.74.Pool chemicals were available on site. The general manager had closed the pool to the public.October 7: The pH was 7.87.October 8: The pH was OR (Over the range).October 9: The pH was OR (Over the range).
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Oct 9: The total alkalinity was 33.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The pH reading from the automated controller (8.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.33). October 7, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (9.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.74). October 8, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (7.8) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (OR). October 9, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (7.8) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (OR). Please ensure there is no significant discrepancy.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The filtration rate was Filtration Rate was 15 gpm/sq.ft (75gpm/5sq.ft).
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The pH was 7.74.Pool chemicals were available on site. The general manager had closed the pool to the public.October 7: The pH was 7.87.October 8: The pH was OR (Over the range).
    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The free available chlorine was 0.10. The total chlorine: 0.27. Chlorine was available on site at the time of inspection. The operator has closed the pool.October 7: Free available chlorine: 0.76.October 8: Free available chlorine: 1.28.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The pH reading from the automated controller (8.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.33). October 7, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (9.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.74). October 8, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (7.8) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (OR). Please ensure there is no significant discrepancy.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The filtration rate was Filtration Rate was 15 gpm/sq.ft (75gpm/5sq.ft).
  4. Risk Management Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The pH was 7.74.Pool chemicals were available on site. The general manager had closed the pool to the public.October 7: The pH was 7.87.
    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The free available chlorine was 0.10. The total chlorine: 0.27. Chlorine was available on site at the time of inspection. The operator has closed the pool.October 7: Free available chlorine: 0.76.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The pH reading from the automated controller (8.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.33). October 7, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (9.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.74). Please ensure there is no significant discrepancy.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The filtration rate was Filtration Rate was 15 gpm/sq.ft (75gpm/5sq.ft).
  5. Monitoring Inspection

    5 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The pH was 7.74.Pool chemicals were available on site. The general manager had closed the pool to the public.
    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • The free available chlorine was 0.10. The total chlorine: 0.27. Chlorine was available on site at the time of inspection. The operator has closed the pool.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • The total alkalinity of the water was over the measurable range (OR). Please ensure that total alkalinity is maintained between 60-180.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The pH reading from the automated controller (8.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.33). October 7, 2026: The pH reading from the automated controller (9.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.74). Please ensure there is no significant discrepancy.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The filtration rate was Filtration Rate was 15 gpm/sq.ft (75gpm/5sq.ft).
  6. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Three chemical tests were performed. Free available chlorine ranged from: 0.04-0.6. Total chlorine ranged from: 0.34-0.53.December 5: The free available chlorine was 0.34. The total chlorine was 0.56.
  7. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The pH reading from the automated controller (8.0) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.33). Please ensure there is no significant discrepancy.
  8. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Three chemical tests were performed. Free available chlorine ranged from: 0.04-0.6. Total chlorine ranged from: 0.34-0.53.December 5: The free available chlorine was 0.34. The total chlorine was 0.56.
  9. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Three chemical tests were performed. Free available chlorine ranged from: 0.04-0.6. Total chlorine ranged from: 0.34-0.53.
    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Three chemical tests were performed. The pH ranged from 7.8-7.9.
    • 05. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Three chemical tests were performed. Total alkalinity ranged from 170-185.
  10. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  11. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • **pH = 7.8 Ensure that pH is maintained between 6.8 and 7.6.July 08, 2024: The hot tub pH was measured to be at 7.99.This is a re-occurring violation. Ensure your pH is maintained between 6.8 and 7.6
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Flow rate observed at the time of inspection: 85usg/min. Operator adjusted the flow rate to 60usg/min during inspection. Turnover period based on 700 USG pool volume: 11minutes.Filtration rate: 60 / (5 sqft Filter Area) = 12US gpm/ft2.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • The pH reading from the automated controller (7.2) was not consistent with the manual pH testing result (7.99). The probes may need servicing or any required repairs. Please work with your pool service provider to ensure there is no significant discrepancy.
  12. Demand Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Pool water sample could not be processed.
    • 04. Is the chemical quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • PHI Pool chemistry reading:FCL = 10.8ppm (there is no added benefit of maintaining this high level of FCL). the required FCL for hot tub is 2ppm.**pH = 7.8 Ensure that pH is maintained between 6.8 and 7.6.
    • 07. Are the filtration, circulation and disinfection systems used to maintain water quality working properly (Non-Critical)?
      • Pool volume = 700 galFlow Rate = 80gpmFilter surface area = 5sq.ft**Filtration Rate = 80gpm/5sq.ft = 16gpm/sq.ft. The maximum filtration rate for a high rate sand filter in a hot tub shall not exceed 12.5gpm/sq.ft. In order to comply, please maintain your flow rate between 47-63gpm. This flow rate willcomply with both the turnover and the filtration rate requirements.- Turnover = 700gal/80gpm = ~9 minutes.- All skimmers appeared clean and equipped with floating weirs.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website