Skip to content
Loading map…

Young Parents Education Program Day Care

2700 College Way Cranbrook BC V1C 5L7 · Restaurant - Food Service

Inspection summary

Young Parents Education Program Day Care has been inspected 11 times by Interior Health Authority since September 17, 2013. The most recent inspection, on September 8, 2025, found no infractions.

7 of 11 inspections on record found no infractions at all. No inspections are on record from the past 12 months. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Food temperature control.

The last 2 inspections in a row found no infractions. The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • Food temperature controlHigher risk

    Bacteria multiply fastest between about 4 °C and 60 °C (40 °F to 140 °F). Inspectors check that cold food stays cold, hot food stays hot, cooked food is cooled quickly, and that staff have accurate thermometers. Temperature problems are one of the most common causes of food poisoning, so these are treated as critical findings.

    Recorded once on October 6, 2015. For example: 1 - Are proper cooking and reheating procedures followed?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, required signage, written procedures and logs. These findings are administrative: the documentation was missing or out of date at the time of inspection.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on November 14, 2018. For example: 3 Are written food handling procedures (Food Safety Plan) current and available on site?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded once on August 28, 2024. For example: 5 Are the FOODSAFE training requirements being met?

About this data

These results come from Interior Health Authority, which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

11 inspections

  1. Monitoring

    0 infractions

  2. Monitoring

    0 infractions

  3. Monitoring

    1 infraction

    • F3.5 Are the FOODSAFE training requirements being met?
      • Observation(s): Operator unable to determine if any of her staff have Food Safe. 1 person per shift must have food Safe.
  4. Monitoring

    0 infractions

  5. Monitoring

    0 infractions

  6. Monitoring

    1 infraction

    • F3.3 Are written food handling procedures (Food Safety Plan) current and available on site?
      • Observation(s): Food safety plan not available at the time of inspection.
      • F3.3A Operator must have written food handling procedures that includes all potentially hazardous foods on site.
  7. Monitoring

    1 infraction

    • F3.7 - Are written food handling procedures (Food Safety Plan) current and available on site?
      • Observation(s): Food safety plan not on site at the time of inspection.
      • F3.7A - Operator must have on site a written food safety management procedure that includes all potentially hazardous foods.
  8. Monitoring

    0 infractions

  9. Monitoring

    1 infraction

    • 1 - Are proper cooking and reheating procedures followed?
      • Observation(s): A thermometer was not available on site to monitor cooking and reheating temperatures.
      • 1.3 - Accurate thermometer must be available to monitor process.
  10. Monitoring

    0 infractions

  11. Monitoring

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website