Skip to content
Loading map…

Mojo Jojo Pickles

9627 82 Avenue NW Edmonton AB T6C 0Z9 · Food - General

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Mojo Jojo Pickles has been inspected 5 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since March 18, 2024. The most recent inspection, on April 30, 2025, recorded 1 infraction.

None of the 5 inspections on record were free of infractions. No inspections are on record from the past 12 months. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pests.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their violations differently, so we group them by what they mean for food safety. Higher-risk findings are the ones inspectors treat as critical, because they can directly make someone sick.

  • PestsHigher risk

    Signs of mice, rats, cockroaches or flies, or gaps and clutter that let them get in or hide. Pests carry bacteria and can contaminate food and surfaces, so evidence of activity is treated seriously and usually triggers a follow-up visit.

    Recorded once on March 12, 2025. For example: Is the facility free of unapproved animals, vermin and/or insects (unless noted elsewhere), and maintained to prevent the entry or harbourage of pests?

  • Building, plumbing and upkeepLower risk

    Floors, walls and ceilings must be smooth and clean, with working lighting, ventilation, plumbing, hot and cold water, and washrooms. These are rarely an immediate food-safety risk on their own, but persistent problems can lead to pest or sanitation issues.

    Recorded 7 times across 5 separate inspections, most recently on April 30, 2025. For example: Is the facility properly constructed and maintained in a state of good repair to allow for the safe and sanitary handling of food?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Most jurisdictions require a certified food handler or manager on site, and some require allergen or food-worker training. These findings mean the paperwork or the trained person was missing at the time. They do not by themselves mean food was handled unsafely.

    Recorded 2 times across 2 separate inspections, most recently on March 12, 2025. For example: Are properly operating hand washing sink(s) accessible to food handlers, located in suitable areas, and stocked with appropriate hand washing supplies?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, required signage, written procedures and logs. These findings are administrative: the documentation was missing or out of date at the time of inspection.

    Recorded once on March 12, 2025. For example: Does the facility have a valid permit and does the facility operate in compliance with the conditions of that permit, or is the facility awaiting approval prior to operation?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

5 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 21. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained in a state of good repair to allow for the safe and sanitary handling of food?
      • No - there was a central section of the flooring in the food preparation area requiring renovation work completion, with repairs in progress (to ensure flooring is smooth, washable, non-absorbent and durable). Yes, hot and cold running water was available at the hand-wash sink in the staff washroom.
  2. Monitoring Inspection

    4 infractions

    • 13. Are properly operating hand washing sink(s) accessible to food handlers, located in suitable areas, and stocked with appropriate hand washing supplies?
      • Yes (corrected during inspection) - the hand-wash sink was obstructed with cardboard boxes and other equipment and must be kept accessible at all times, so as to ensure ease of use by all staff for adequate hand-washing. This was corrected at time of inspection.
    • 16. Is the facility free of unapproved animals, vermin and/or insects (unless noted elsewhere), and maintained to prevent the entry or harbourage of pests?
      • Yes (corrected during inspection) - staff are to ensure there is at least one pest control service each month (whether by use of a licensed pest control company or staff completion of the AHS 'monthly pest control checklist' - with records to be kept for a period of one year).Note: a copy of the AHS 'monthly pest control checklist' was provided to the operator by email for review and use, as necessary.
    • 19. Does the facility have a valid permit and does the facility operate in compliance with the conditions of that permit, or is the facility awaiting approval prior to operation?
      • No - the current Food Handling Permit was not on display for public viewing, and must be posted in a conspicuous location, visible to the public at all times.
    • 21. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained in a state of good repair to allow for the safe and sanitary handling of food?
      • No - there was a central section of the flooring in the food preparation area requiring renovation work / repair (to ensure flooring is smooth, washable, non-absorbent and durable). Also, there was no hot and cold running water at the hand-wash sink in the staff washroom. The operator is to enquire with the landlord to ensure there is sufficient and full water pressure at all sinks in the food premises.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 21. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained in a state of good repair to allow for the safe and sanitary handling of food?
      • Ceiling panels were rough and required replacement.
  4. Risk Management Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 21. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained in a state of good repair to allow for the safe and sanitary handling of food?
      • Ceiling panels were rough and required replacement.
    • 23. Is the facility maintained in a clean and sanitary condition?
      • Back processing area required cleaning front-to-back.
  5. Monitoring Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 13. Are properly operating hand washing sink(s) accessible to food handlers, located in suitable areas, and stocked with appropriate hand washing supplies?
      • Back sink was not operational. Owner indicated that she was awaiting a part to fix the sink.
    • 21. Is the facility properly constructed and maintained in a state of good repair to allow for the safe and sanitary handling of food?
      • Ceiling panels were rough and required replacement.
    • 23. Is the facility maintained in a clean and sanitary condition?
      • Back processing area required cleaning front-to-back.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website