Skip to content
Loading map…

Skin Lueur Aesthetics and Laser Centre (South) Inc.

5924 104 Street NW Edmonton AB T6H 2K3 · Personal Services

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Skin Lueur Aesthetics and Laser Centre (South) Inc. has been inspected 5 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since March 26, 2024. The most recent inspection, on February 12, 2025, found no infractions.

2 of 5 inspections on record found no infractions at all. No inspections are on record from the past 12 months. All recorded findings relate to upkeep, equipment or paperwork rather than direct infection-control risks to clients.

Recent inspections have recorded fewer infractions than earlier ones, so the record is improving.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for clients. In personal service settings like salons, spas and tattoo studios, higher-risk findings are the ones that could spread infection from one client to the next, through broken skin, blood or instruments that were not properly cleaned and sterilized.

  • Equipment and utensilsLower risk

    Instruments, chairs, tables and footbaths must be made of materials that can be cleaned, kept in good repair and stored so they stay clean. Single-use items such as nail files, buffers, razors and needles must be thrown away after each client.

    Recorded 7 times across 3 separate inspections, most recently on February 4, 2025. For example: Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?

  • Permits, records and postingLower risk

    Operating permits, client records, sterilization logs and required signage. Client records matter because they let health officials contact people if an infection is linked to the business.

    Recorded 2 times on January 27, 2025. For example: Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?

  • Other findingsLower risk

    Findings that do not fit the categories above, such as follow-ups that confirm an earlier violation was corrected, or requirements specific to this type of facility.

    Recorded once on January 27, 2025. For example: Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

5 inspections

  1. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  2. Risk Management Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • The concentration of the high-level disinfectant was tested, but the test strips were improper. Please obtain new test strips.
  3. Risk Management Inspection

    3 infractions

    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • The concentration of the high-level disinfectant was tested, but the test strips were improper. Please obtain new test strips.
    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • Needles used for wart removal were used against manufacturer's instructions (labelled as "acupuncture" needles) and did not have adequate sterility assurance information available (no lot number). Please discontinue use of these needles and obtain appropriate needles.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • The M-369 machine (energy-emmitting device) did not have a manufacturer's manual. If manual is not available, discontinue use of the equipment.
  4. Monitoring Inspection

    6 infractions

    • 03. Are facility-specific written procedures established to adequately describe safe and sanitary practices?
      • Written procedures for skin cleansing and antiseptic use prior to services were not available.
    • 12. Are personal services workers at the facility maintaining client records and where applicable, sterility documentation corresponding to that client?
      • Sterility assurance documentation for needles and microneedles was not kept with clients' forms. Ensure that sterility assurance documentation is kept with clients' forms for at least 2 years.
    • 20. Is reusable equipment disinfected properly?
      • The concentration of the high-level disinfectant was tested, but the test strips were improper. Please obtain new test strips.
    • 21. Is equipment that is intended to be sterile maintained sterile at the point of use?
      • Needles used for wart removal were used against manufacturer's instructions (labelled as "acupuncture" needles) and did not have adequate sterility assurance information available (no lot number). Please discontinue use of these needles and obtain appropriate needles.
    • 25. Are the equipment manufacturer's instructions for use of specific equipment available and followed?
      • The M-369 machine (energy-emmitting device) did not have a manufacturer's manual. If manual is not available, discontinue use of the equipment.
    • 26. Are cosmetic products appropriate for their intended use and being handled properly?
      • The numbing cream used for microneedling service and Ultrasound Gel were used against manufacturer's instructions (expired). Please obtain new products.
  5. Demand Inspection

    0 infractions

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website