Skip to content
Loading map…

Crossbow Landing - Indoor Whirlpool

160 Crossbow Place Canmore AB T1W 3H5 · Aquatic Facility

Official record from Alberta →

Inspection summary

Crossbow Landing - Indoor Whirlpool has been inspected 11 times by Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health) since April 5, 2024. The most recent inspection, on March 12, 2026, recorded 2 infractions.

3 of 11 inspections on record found no infractions at all. In the past 12 months there were 2 inspections with 2 infractions recorded. The higher-risk findings here relate to: Pool and spa water quality.

The number of infractions per inspection has stayed roughly the same over time.

What these findings mean

Health authorities word their findings differently, so we group them by what they mean for the people using the facility. Higher-risk findings are the ones that could directly cause illness or injury, such as water that is not properly treated.

  • Pool and spa water qualityHigher risk

    For pools, spas and splash pads, inspectors test disinfectant levels, pH and water clarity, and check safety equipment. Water that is not properly treated can spread skin, ear and stomach infections.

    Recorded 9 times across 8 separate inspections, most recently on March 12, 2026. For example: Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?

  • Food safety training and certificationLower risk

    Many jurisdictions require trained pool operators and certified lifeguards. These findings mean required training, certification or staffing records were missing at the time of inspection.

    Recorded once on March 12, 2026. For example: Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?

About this data

These results come from Alberta Health Services (Environmental Public Health), which inspects food premises and other public facilities in this area. We republish the authority's public disclosure data and refresh it regularly; the official record is the final word.

11 inspections

  1. Monitoring Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 12. Are the general safety devices and physical conditions in this pool providing a safe environment (Critical)?
      • The flow rate of the circulation and jet pumps combined exceeds 150gpm, which is the maximum allowable flow rate for the submerged suction outlets. Jet pump will need to be disabled or flow to jet pump reduced so that the combined flow rate for both pumps does not exceed 150gpm. Other options to eliminate risk is to have a secured control system which could include any of the following: a permanently installed flow restrictor plate, locks on valve adjustment handle for the jet pump (once flow restricted to acceptable flow rate), removal of valve adjustment handle on jet pump (once flow restricted to acceptable flow rate), lockout tag that must be cut to change valve position (once flow restricted to acceptable flow rate), variable speed drive pump with control system that is protected by a password and/or variable frequency drive with control system that is protected by a password.
    • 17. Does the pool have adequate written policies, plans and posted rules and safety information to ensure that the pool is operating in a safe manner?
      • Anti-entrapment plan will need to be updated due to incorrect flow rate listed for the jet pump.
  2. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  3. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample from Thursday September 25th, 2025, had Total Coliforms present.- Operators were informed to treat and re-sample.
  4. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • Water sample from Thursday May 29th, 2025, had Total Coliforms present.- Operators were informed to treat and re-sample.
  5. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  6. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • December 5, 2024 water sample had total coliforms isolated. Treat whirlpool water to remove contamination. Resample.
  7. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample from Thursday September 12th, 2024, had and HPC of 140 cfu.ml. - Operators were informed to treat and re-sample.
  8. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • Water sample taken August 22, 2024 was not tested as the requisition form indicated it was taken on September 22, 2024.
  9. Risk Management Inspection

    0 infractions

  10. Demand Inspection

    2 infractions

    • 02. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Critical)?
      • April 18/24 water sample had total coliforms present. Treat water to remove contamination and resample.
    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • April 18/24 water sample had a plate count of 230cfu/ml. Treat water to remove contamination and resample.
  11. Demand Inspection

    1 infraction

    • 03. Is the bacteriological quality of the water in this pool satisfactory (Non-Critical)?
      • April 4/24 water sample was not tested as there was no id# on the bottle and the access number was not written on the requisition form. Resample to be submitted Monday.

Nearby inspected facilities

Own this business? Add a badge to your website